They are a burden for those who do not pay do not, then the rest of us (for care in the emergency and disaster as we are now!)
Taxes are included in Section 1 of Article 8 of the Constitution of the United States.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, levies and taxes to pay the debts and for the common defense and general welfare of the United States"
**** It is a nice sampling of 2.5%. It clearly says "taxes". I read the text in the house (not the Senate, not the account is based) on the connection.
Following a strict interpretation of the Constitution is unconstitutional, but since the birth of this nation, all political parties have used interpretations of loose and strict when it suited its agenda. Believe it or not, it is unconstitutional to fillibuster Republican Dirty Shame. What is the project? This bill is not a problem when it examined by the Supreme Court because, under the prevailing interpretation of the Constitution is unconstitutional.
Jesse is correct, as the speed of not having health insurance is simply a tax that is constitutional. The rest of the bill can not possibly be justified because of the elastic clause.
It is covered by the trade clause. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress has unlimited power to regulate commerce in the United States. Everything about the purchase or sale of the property may be regulated by Congress.
So, on a strictly constitutional, that your question answered.
"I propose a new symbol for the Democrats. Departure: ass. In: a giant pacifier for adults". ~ Michelle Malkin proposal http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleM ...
I tell you, PERSONNEL AND SECURITY binding legislation coming down the pipe is terrible!
Because they are liberals. They are above the law and the Constitution. He remains in 2010. All the election who voted for this person and will be sent when you on the grave there are mothers who will summon this monster. Taken time for the hands of a few people and they hit hard.
Where is it written that it is not? The plans are constitutional as well as the Patriot Act.
I am constantly amazed that many Americans of the real health problems, relying instead on FOX and other sources to lies about the U.S. health care and foreign expansion are not aware of. I mean, if medical care in countries where universal coverage is so bad, why keep? Obama wants the insurance more accessible to everyone and change the system so that it value for money to the people of America [1]. He wants to change the policy so much trouble, from the payment for the treatment. The proposed system is similar to what is in Taiwan, where private companies are involved in health care [2]. Obama has fought on the reform of the health system. He said he wanted more insurance available and was chosen by the American people to do [3]. FACT - the United States has a higher mortality rate among children under one year and less than five Western European countries with of the general health insurance [4]. To increase FACT - U.S. insurance rates and work to stop paying claims on the cover [5]. - The fact that the U.S. is more on health per capita than any other nation on the planet [6]. This means that an American had died four years have a better chance to live if they were born in any Western country to have universal health coverage. If you do not like the policies that Obama has been chosen, you can always be removed from office in 2012. But if you do not agree with the facts, please let me know. I am always willing to learn, but please prove. None of those who did not agree with me so far made.
10 comments:
In reality, they are paving the way for introducing someone to buy a Chevrolet for the rescue of GM.
Jesse: It is not only taxing those who do not pay attention to. Almost all have the attention will also be taxed in one way or another.
If you say you have to purchase an insurance policy you can not say that to buy you?
They have not all citizens to purchase insurance.
They are a burden for those who do not pay do not, then the rest of us (for care in the emergency and disaster as we are now!)
Taxes are included in Section 1 of Article 8 of the Constitution of the United States.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, levies and taxes to pay the debts and for the common defense and general welfare of the United States"
**** It is a nice sampling of 2.5%. It clearly says "taxes". I read the text in the house (not the Senate, not the account is based) on the connection.
Following a strict interpretation of the Constitution is unconstitutional, but since the birth of this nation, all political parties have used interpretations of loose and strict when it suited its agenda. Believe it or not, it is unconstitutional to fillibuster Republican Dirty Shame. What is the project? This bill is not a problem when it examined by the Supreme Court because, under the prevailing interpretation of the Constitution is unconstitutional.
Jesse is correct, as the speed of not having health insurance is simply a tax that is constitutional. The rest of the bill can not possibly be justified because of the elastic clause.
It is covered by the trade clause. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress has unlimited power to regulate commerce in the United States. Everything about the purchase or sale of the property may be regulated by Congress.
So, on a strictly constitutional, that your question answered.
"I propose a new symbol for the Democrats. Departure: ass. In: a giant pacifier for adults".
~ Michelle Malkin proposal http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleM ...
I tell you, PERSONNEL AND SECURITY binding legislation coming down the pipe is terrible!
Because they are liberals. They are above the law and the Constitution. He remains in 2010. All the election who voted for this person and will be sent when you on the grave there are mothers who will summon this monster. Taken time for the hands of a few people and they hit hard.
Know Pelosi Witch (liberals of the West) want, "Are you serious .... this is serious."
The reason is that American taxpayers are still subsidizing the uninsured, we are now paying () with great effort.
This is really a legalized theft, and they want all the money. No stock records.
Where is it written that it is not? The plans are constitutional as well as the Patriot Act.
I am constantly amazed that many Americans of the real health problems, relying instead on FOX and other sources to lies about the U.S. health care and foreign expansion are not aware of. I mean, if medical care in countries where universal coverage is so bad, why keep?
Obama wants the insurance more accessible to everyone and change the system so that it value for money to the people of America [1]. He wants to change the policy so much trouble, from the payment for the treatment. The proposed system is similar to what is in Taiwan, where private companies are involved in health care [2].
Obama has fought on the reform of the health system. He said he wanted more insurance available and was chosen by the American people to do [3].
FACT - the United States has a higher mortality rate among children under one year and less than five Western European countries with of the general health insurance [4].
To increase FACT - U.S. insurance rates and work to stop paying claims on the cover [5].
- The fact that the U.S. is more on health per capita than any other nation on the planet [6].
This means that an American had died four years have a better chance to live if they were born in any Western country to have universal health coverage.
If you do not like the policies that Obama has been chosen, you can always be removed from office in 2012. But if you do not agree with the facts, please let me know. I am always willing to learn, but please prove. None of those who did not agree with me so far made.
Post a Comment